« ReOrient: Global Economy in the Asian Age | The Selected Writings of Eqbal Ahmad »
Imperial Legacy: The Ottoman Imprint on the Balkans and the Middle East
![]() |
Imperial Legacy |
The term "Ottoman" does not often evoke a positive response. Few empires have been as villified as this one. Detractors include its own Muslim subjects - a majority of the intelligentsia I would venture - who accuse the empire of being responsible for their current backwardness. The heirs of its former Christian subjects perceive it as a long era of oppression. The heirs of its former Christian rivals see it as the embodiement of Islamic expansionism, an alien Asiatic, Oriental, Turkic state which threatened Europe. Few identify the Ottoman Empire as a direct part of their own heritage.
This collection of essays explores the extent to which the Ottoman legacy persists. Written by a group of professors who study different aspects of this legacy, this book also tries to describe the inherited perceptions of this empire. It demonstrates how the Ottoman Empire was a successor to both the Abbasid and Byzantine empires, and that it was more often a multiconfessional empire than an Islamic one, not just by the composition of its populations but by its social, cultural, political and economic underpinnings. These factors both strengthened the empire and also led to its eventual demise. The character of the empire was more than just Middle-Eastern and North African, it was very European as well, not just geographically but also in its interactions, exchanges and mutual influences with other European nations. Approaching from the perspective of inheritance, this book adds a vivid dimension to a society that contrary to popular perceptions, was very dynamic and tried to reform itself several times in all sectors even during its decline.
Writing about the Ottoman legacy objectively can be difficult. Most of the issues dealt with are very contemporary in nature. They still touch sensitive identity questions, whether in Eastern Europe or in the Middle East. The common negative perceptions - or the idealized ones that are gradually becoming prevalent among many Islamic revivalists - easily fit with the perceived dichotomy between a "Christian West" and "Islamic East". As a result, positive or negative bias occasionally crops up in the writing, and the editor acknowledges this. However, I did not feel this subjectivity stemmed from political preconceptions. When it occured, it was likely the result of academic passion for a specific subject area, or the influence of dominant narratives. Regardless, the overall quality of research was not compromised.
Rediscovering recent MENA history - both from an internal view and from the perspective of its interaction with Europe - in a less dismissive and simplistic manner than the usual nationalist narratives - is what makes this book worthwhile. Filled with both academic analysis and enlightening anecdotes, it is hardly a difficult read. Depending on one's predilections, some sections might be more engaging than others. Each deals with some aspect of the Ottoman legacy - memories, political, economic and military inheritance, as well as culture, religion and even language. Overall, Imperial Legacy paints a highly nuanced picture of the Ottoman Empire, and can certainly serve as a stepping stone to more advanced areas of study.
Posted by Shaheen at December 15, 2006 09:57 PM
Filed Under: 18th - 20th century
, Ottoman Empire
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.aqoul.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/3112
Comments
well, I think this book has been out for a while and that you are publishing a review after, for how long? at least 4 year it was published after as a paperback, is very very obvious that you really don't have a clue about the Empire of the humankind after the Roman Empire!
Posted by: Errol Ezra at December 22, 2006 06:55 PM
The point of the Books & Media section is to talk about interesting books, regardless of publication date. Doesn't matter if they're a year old or 20 years old.
What are we, the bloody New York Times now?
Posted by: eerie
at December 22, 2006 07:32 PM
Makes me want to dig out my old, original 1898 pressing of Bob, Son of Battle to review. I'm sure we could come up with some linkage to the Islamic world. Maybe, oh - attitudes towards pets vs. working animals or something. Or we could just go with the flow and have a discussion on the literary "Mother of All Dog Fights." Ain't no one ever beating out BSB in that category :D.
That aside, I have to admit to a fascination with the phrase "Empire of the humankind." It brings to mind grandiose space opera. Pournelle, perhaps?
Posted by: Tamerlane at December 24, 2006 12:14 AM

RSS




